Tuesday, July 11, 2006

Newsletter of 07/09/06

Somos el Cuerpo de Cristo
Thoughts from Some Fellow Parishioners of Holy Spirit—July 9, 2006

Thoughts About Galas and Other Things
We had a partial report of the Parish’s 25th Anniversary Gala in the bulletin on July 2nd which indicated that the proceeds were approximately $47,700. Whether this is a gross or net figure wasn’t made clear, but who’s counting? What was striking was the editorial comment that the Gala was a great sign of the Parish’s unity. It is difficult to see how such a conclusion could be arrived at, since the event was attended by only 125 people (approximately) and could hardly be characterized as drawing from a representative cross-section of the Parish.

The generosity of those attending (contributions of ≈$760 per couple) is commendable, but we need to ask ourselves is this the sort of Parish that we really want—one supported on special occasions with large donations from a small group of people? The model of a tithing parish supported week in and week out by a large cross-section of the parishioners is one that was very successful in the past and seems closer to the notion of a community where everyone has a stake rather than one in which only a few can realistically contribute. Even though Holy Spirit sits in upper class, well-to-do North McAllen, it is only recently that events in which a family spends almost $800 in an evening would be thought of as an appropriate way to raise money or have a parish celebration.

“But our contemplative and mystical traditions won’t let us forget that God is ultimately mystery and we know far less about God than we sometimes think. Do we really believe that we know the truth about God, the truth about the Spirit of God, the truth about grace and redemption? Do we believe, on a completely different and subservient level, that we know precisely what structures best serve the vitality and mission of the Church in any given period of history? Some of us apparently do. And we cannot tolerate any doubt about our convictions whatsoever. When this happens, we make idols of our ideologies masking them as theological givens.

“Perhaps it is the nature of religious conviction and belief that we assume a defensive, superior posture not only against other religious traditions but also against fellow believers who embrace our common faith from different perspectives. It is precisely against this faulty religious fidelity that the prophets of all ages speak out so strongly. The prophets of old understood more clearly than we do today that the most blinding fault of the true believer is always idolatry – making a historically conditioned understanding of God’s mysterious ways into immutable truths that stand in no need whatsoever of further plumbing and reflection.

“…What is so striking about the present cultural wars engaging many of the developed Euro-American countries is that they are only minimally doctrinal in nature if doctrinal at all—understanding doctrine here as revealed teaching. More often than not, the matters so fiercely contested are about church structures, ecclesiastical disciplines, the role of the laity, and the hot button issues of accountability, transparency, and governance. What is at stake, it should be clear, is not revealed truth but long-standing lines of control and power.”
From Faith That Dares to Speak, Rev. Donald Cozzens. Submitted by fellow parishioner, Michelle Peña

$$$$$ Update
The Sunday Bulletin of April 9th did not have a report of the collections for the weekend of April 1st and 2nd. Using the average of the collections from 10/16/05 for that weekend and the reported amounts for the other weekends, we can estimate that since 10/16/05 parishioners have donated $54,790.95 less than the $551,000 the parish budget called for during that period. If the spending patterns of the last fiscal year have continued (13.4% over budget), then this gives a total of $128,596.83 of red ink (versus budget) for the period 10/16/05 to 7/2/06. Stretching that pattern for an entire year, the Parish would fall short by $175,974.60

Downfall of a Priest
DARIEN, Conn., July 8 — The Rev. Michael Jude Fay repeatedly spent thousands of dollars on luggage, jewelry and designer clothes, even though his salary was a modest $28,000 a year.

To many of his parishioners at St. John Roman Catholic Church in Darien, Father Fay's lavish ways came as a shock nearly two months ago when the Diocese of Bridgeport demanded his resignation because of questions about his suitability for the priesthood, his lifestyle and his financial stewardship of the church.

Parishioners say there were warning signs about his spending, such as a black-tie bash he threw for himself at one of the premier hotels in Manhattan in May 2003 to commemorate his 25th anniversary in the priesthood. But the Bridgeport Diocese did not pressure him to step aside until this year, after private investigators hired by the parish's bookkeeper and associate pastor documented at least $200,000 in questionable spending by Father Fay.

For all his outward success, it was evident that Father Fay had an appetite for little luxuries, such as the blond highlights his Darien hairdresser said he put in his hair. A small bridal shower he threw for a Sunday school teacher had a three-piece combo and jaw-dropping flower arrangements, a person who attended said.

Parishioners said he spent thousands of dollars sprucing up the church and expanding the house where the priests lived. When one parent questioned the cost of a tapestry, Father Fay cut her off by saying, “What makes you think it wasn't a gift?”

Parishioners would call the office, wanting to discuss their problems with the priest, she said, and “every time Jude would get on the phone, he'd roll his eyes.” Over time, she and others said, they noticed that he left more of the pastoral work to his parochial vicar, the Rev. Michael J. Madden.

Father Fay did not relinquish his tight control over the church's finances, however, according to the church's bookkeeper, and the investigators she and Father Madden hired in May to look into possible improprieties at the church.

Father Fay typically kept donations to the church in his desk drawer instead of promptly depositing them in the church's bank account, making it difficult to track how the funds were used, said one of the investigators hired by Father Madden.

In recent years, Father Fay also picked the members of the church's lay boards rather than let parishioners cast ballots, as they once did.

In April, the bookkeeper and Father Madden took their concerns to the diocese. Father Fay appeared before the bishop on May 9 to respond to the allegations but left without being relieved of his duties.

Frustrated, the bookkeeper and Father Madden asked investigators to review records the bookkeeper had copied. On May 17, these investigators took their findings to the Darien police. The bishop asked Father Fay to resign and to leave the premises that same day. NY Times, 7/9/06.

Mi Casa Es Su Casa
Rumors are constant in any community, and they are even contradictory ones floating around at the same time. We keep hearing that the Monsignor is soon moving on to another parish—“it’s just another month or so.” We also hear that the current rectory is going to be sold, and those proceeds, together with 25th Anniversary profits, will be put to building a new rectory on the Parish grounds. Those two rumors are certainly at odds, right? No pastor would so irresponsible as to put another financial burden on a parish just as he was leaving it, would he? Certainly no pastor would put personal comfort above needed maintenance of the parish plant.

Maybe the rumors aren’t true. We’ll have to see.

Prepared by RGV Parishioners for Progress and edited by Jerry Brazier. Copy this, and pass it on to fellow parishioners, either by e-mail or paper. If you want an opportunity for prayerful discussion of these and other issues about the parish or have any other comments, please contact us at mailto:gbrazier@rgv.rr.com

Posting a Comment: You may now submit a comment simply by clicking "POST A COMMENT" under the "COMMENTS" link below. Approval of comments are done only to prevent any objectionable or advertising type posts. You may also e-mail this article to a friend, by clicking on the envelope icon below.


Anonymous said...

Re: Galas and Other Things.
One good thing about the money raised at the Gala, none of the $47,700 is subject to the normal diocesan tax. Wow, what a neat way to keep the Bishop from getting his percentage... Way to go, Louie!

Anonymous said...

Re: $$$$$ Update.
Am I adding wrong? It seems the $47,700 raised by the 'extremely successful' Elite Gala is still over $128,000 short of the funds needed to make up the parish budget deficit.
Based on all the 'extremely successful' comments I have heard, I somehow got the impression that it had cleared enough to at least get the parish out of the red.
Maybe everybody has their own definition of 'extremely successful'! $47,700 Vs. $175,974 doesn't even come close in my book!

Anonymous said...

Re: Mi Casa.
I am not one to wish ill on anyone, but transferring Louie to another parish would be God-sent for Holy Spirit parish! I just hate to think of another parish ending-up with him!
Maybe he could be transferred to the Shrine. All of his dramatics would probably work well there and, since most of the visitors to the Shrine are there one day - gone the next, no one would actually be exposed to all of his lies and bullshit!
No, on second thought, his absolute lack of organization and management ability would certainly destroy that place, too. I know, why doesn’t the bishop just transfer him to Mexico, like he did Father Ivan? Lets all pray!

Anonymous said...

Re: Mi Casa
It would also be very un-Christian of us to send Fr. Louis to our neighbors in Mexico. His disposition can only be solved by the grace of God! As stated, lets all pray!

Anonymous said...

Re: Financial Burden on leaving a Parish
To ascertain Fr. Louie’s financial responsibility when leaving a parish, why not ask a few parishioners from his previous parish just what kind of financial condition he left them in when he left their parish?

Anonymous said...

I am a parishioner from his previous parish. Yes why don't you ask us. Father louie was the inspiration and leadership our parish needed at a time when it was so in debt. Father with the help of the parish is responsible for paying off almost a million dollars worth of debt. Ask anyone in our parish and you will have no arguments we would welcome him back in an instant and where ever he goes he is a wealth of spirit and dedication to the lord. With this type of spiritual leadership there wouldn't be groups like yours which only fuel controversies that have us in the public eye and point us out. I think befor you post a comment like yours you should invest the time and actually speak to some of us. We pray everyday for Father Louie and the turbulations he has encountered at your parish and we back him up every step of the way. If you are so set in changing things why don't you do what King Henry the VIII did and leave the church and go your way so you can instill your own conditions. Let us true catholics continue our path to the lord.

Anonymous said...

Any priest that EXCLUDES some of his parishioners from serving on ministries, from singing in the choir or from being a Eucharistic Minister or Reader, somehow just doesn't seem to reflect that 'wealth of spirit and dedication to the Lord' that you so generously described as Father Louie. How can you say that about him when his EXCLUSION of parishioners goes against everything that Christ tried to teach us?
Please do continue your path to the Lord; just don't be so blinded by spiritual leaders that try to instill their own ideas into Christ's teachings and don’t try to convince me that I should leave my Church. The Church is fine; it’s the Church leadership that has lost sight of what Christ was all about. God gave you a brain; use it to keep your Church's leadership in line with what HE taught!

Anonymous said...

Father Louie's type of spiritual leadership (or lack thereof) has promoted a huge division among the parishioners in our parish. A 'real' representative of Jesus would have made every possible effort to unite our parish and bring its parishioners together. Father Louie has failed miserably at that task. And, isn't it a shame that we have to post our thoughts anonymously, in fear that he will retaliate against us. What a sad set of affairs!